|
| | | 
Security Director
|
| Firstly, I speak on behalf of the Pork and Security, thanking those chatters that report incidents such as these.
Secondly, Security tries to respond as quickly as possible to our calls.
Thirdly, we would ask chatters to check the user list to see if indeed a Security Team Member is on the list in chat rooms, working these calls.
If so, then you know we are on the call ASAP.
At this time, I would like to thank all of the concerned chatters for taking the time to give us a 'heads up' on issues like these.
thumper~ You did fine. 
You help make our job quite abit easier.
Most sincere thanks!
CW~
"If we have no peace,
It is because we have
Forgotten that we
Belong to each other."
- Mother Teresa
|
| |
| | | | Stupid question...
CW sez...
"Thirdly, we would ask chatters to check the user list to see if indeed a Security Team Member is on the list in chat rooms, working these calls.
If so, then you know we are on the call ASAP."
Is there somethin' special next to someone's name on the list to denote that they are an STM?
|
| |
| | |
Security Director
|
| Puter,
There sure will be, in the form of:
Pork Security
Security1
Security3
Security5
at the present time.
Any other nicknames than the above listed would be someone 'impersonating' Security.
(Which we would appreciate a 'heads up' should this happen) security@the-pork.com.
CW~
"If we have no peace,
It is because we have
Forgotten that we
Belong to each other."
- Mother Teresa
|
| |
| | | | CW...
Excuse my confusion, but I am an old, feeble man that is blessed with CRS.
No Security2 or Security4?
This seems somewhat confusing to an old man that now has to remember "odd numbers only". |
| |
| | | 
Security Director
|
| Trust me on this one Puter ;p
"If we have no peace,
It is because we have
Forgotten that we
Belong to each other."
- Mother Teresa
|
| |
| | | | an interesting variation to all this as well
report it yes.....
it also might be an undercover cop
on a sting operation......
|
| |
| | |
Security Director
|
| Very good point airmid.
In the event this is the case, Security gets 'heads up' on an underager in the Adult Section, I'm sure once asked for age verification they would divulge the proper ID to us.
"If we have no peace,
It is because we have
Forgotten that we
Belong to each other."
- Mother Teresa
|
| |
| | | | | I wouldn't doubt for a moment that it could very well be an undercover cop. I mean just look at the boards lately, all the talk of Daddy/little girl stuff and all the icons of women in little girl nightgowns with teddy bears. I would think certain things flag a cop to sites. I know most sites don't allow talk of Daddy little girl stuff, or scening it, or any icons depicting children in adult rooms for that very reason. I am sure I will get My ass jumped on again for My views on this, but even if the people doing this, scening it, using those type icons don't intend that, they are certainly giving the view to the outside world they condone sexual violence against children. I just find it all a bit sad and disheartening. It doesn't matter what people scene in fantasy as long as they aren't harming anyone, it just seems to Me though, when they do it openly, they could very well be harming people, because it does give the appearance of condonong vile things, even when it isn't their intent. |
| |
| | | | This is about the only thing I have ever complained to (and asked some thing be done by) Security. I cut and paste the post and send it off. I usually do not even ask for a response, just someone to check out the poster.
I would like any one that replies to the poster checked out as well.
Security has always responded quickly and taken the postings very seriously.
CW and her team are awesome.
The other thing I have done is cut and pasted any time (and this has only happen twice that i can remember) the addy any one post about children and send it off to the FBI. I report all child sexual links to them.
|
| |
| | | | | I have a question for you CW. Clearly child pornography is illegal on any chat site, but I am wondering where that line is drawn. There has been a huge influx of "Daddy/little girl" icons since the discussion about it, and the upcoming discussion about it in the Chamber tomorrow. Some of these images CLEARLY depict children (most depcit women acting as little girls, but some are certainly children with Daddy little girl sayings on them) and since they are being used in D/s, is that crossing a line? Do they need some disclaimer on these icons? Where do you draw the line on using children's images in adult chatrooms for scening and posting purposes when they have sexual conotation in the sayings? I am offended by this, and anyone and everyone can quote Me on that...This message was edited by KnightHawk{cath} on 6-19-06 @ 6:40 PM |
| |
|
|