|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am thinking even this documentation will not be enough for bree, nor will an Iraqi victory in court. Nothing short of God speaking on a PA system wil be enough.
If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true, is really true, there would be little hope of advance......
Orville Wright
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lets say I trust the BBC, KestrelBrighteyes. The story starts with "I have no documentation". It ends with "there is no evidence". It says there are 3 children born each day in Fallujah with birth defects that may be caused by phosphorous and depleted uranium yet there is no evidence.
Let us say it one more time. There is no evidence. That comes from the BBC.
Stories based on the BBC article that leave out the part about "no evidence" are in dispute as well. As you say, there are many that use the BBC story. All of your stories use the BBC "story" and interview the same two doctors who admit that they have no evidence.
Saddam did not allow any studies done that might embarrass him under his regime. That is why you have this seeming disparity. Not your agent orange conspiracy and evil governments "disappearing" doctors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sad thing about bree is, she chooses to play little deaf person when anyone says something true, that she does not like. Damn! She sounds male!
If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true, is really true, there would be little hope of advance......
Orville Wright
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| the term is willful ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes Bree, the UPI, the BBC, the Guardian, and every other media outlet that's ever reported on this are involved in a conspiracy to make the US look bad.
The British and Iraqi officials are in on it, and they're trying to get the UN on it too, by asking for an investigation.
Those in the US government who admitted the US used weapons in that area that have been known to cause birth defects were all in on the conspiracy as well.
The birth defects shown in the videos were all faked by the same people who faked birth defects in the babies born to women after the bombing of Hiroshima, the spraying of agent orange in VietNam, and Chernobyl.
The chemicals that are in the water the people are drinking, the food they are eating, and the air they are breathing are perfectly safe - there's no way they could affect pregnant women or unborn children.
(/snark)
BTW, all of the stories were NOT based on the BBC story - you'd know that if you actually watched the videos and read the links.
And this isn't the first depleted uranium has caused problems. Stories of and increase in birth defects and in different kinds of cancer came out after the first Gulf War - and it's not just Iraqis.
But please, don't let the facts get in the way of your denial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Story -
From the April 2003 Idaho Observer:
Death By Slow Burn:How America Nukes Its Own Troops
What “Support Our Troops” really means
by Amy Worthington
http://proliberty.com/observer/20030401.htm
Check the sources in the endnotes too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think the point is being missed here. The BBC are one of the most accurate news reporting agencies world wide and they check their sources more than most other agencies. The point here is that this reporter and the BBC by exgtension, has been given a heads-up on a situation. Its confirmed in so far as they have seen evidence and have spoken to doctors that are experiencing this explosion of birth defects.
This piece of reporting is accurately saying that there is no evidence or proof. Nothing concrete past the word of the doctors, mothers and what the reporter is seeing.
This is a scoop. The BBC have the preliminary story that there may well be something here that would leave us, the 'allies' blamed for causing these defects. Its the start of a process that will eventually, end up with an enquiry and after that, should an enquiry show that our weapons were to blame, with the possible prosecution against our military.
This piece does not pertain to being a proven evidential report. Its a heads up on a developing situation that is very likely to have substance and may be proven to be true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a report without evidence.
One only need read the report.
Also the UPI, MNN, The Guardian and many others do, in fact, use the BBC "report" which interviews two doctors. Both of the doctors say they have no evidence.
One only need read the reports that are linked to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conspiracy! Conspiracy!
Wonder how much they paid the parents to fake the birth defects in the video and photos?
|
|
|
|